Seven Research Questions Results, Hypotheses, On GRC and Empirical Evidence Research

This file states 7 research questions about men’s GRC and psychological health. Journal references relevant to these questions are listed. The empirical connection between GRC and men’s psychological problems is presented from correlational, moderation, mediation, and situational studies.

Three of the research questions address masculinity ideology and GRC empirical relationship to men’s psychological problems. Overall, there is support for the hypothesis that masculinity ideology and GRC relate to men’s psychological problems.

Two other questions focus on whether gender role devaluations, restrictions, and violations relate to psychological problems of both minority men and men in general. This data base provides some initial evidence that GRC restricts men, involves devaluation of self and others, and includes potential violation of others and self.

Another question addressed is whether diversity/multicultural indices correlate, moderate, or mediate men’s GRC with oppressions like: racism, sexism, ethnocentrism, heterosexism, homophobia, biases against racial and sexual minorities. Forty studies have found relationships between GRC and personal oppression, discrimination, abuse, or violence.

The final question addresses how GRC occurs in situations and the causative dynamics of the conflict.

Finally, the O’Neil and Denke (2016) references related to these seven research questions are summarized for easy access to specific studies.

 
The Research Questions for Consideration:
  1. Do masculinity ideologies significantly relate to GRC (SPC, RE, RABBM, CBWFR)? What aspects of masculinity ideology correlates with GRC?
  2. Do masculinity ideologies significantly relate to men’s psychological problems? What aspects of masculinity ideologies correlate with men’s problems?
  3. Do the patterns of men’s GRC (SPC, RE, RABBM, CBWFR) correlate with men’s psychological and interpersonal problems? Which problems areas are correlated with GRC?
  4. Does men’s GRC (SPC, RE, RABBM, & CBWFR) relate to gender role devaluations, restrictions, and violations of self and others in both the intrapersonal and interpersonal realms?
  5. Is there evidence that gender role devaluations, restrictions, and violations relate to minority men’s psychological problems?
  6. Do Diversity and Multicultural Indices Relate To , Moderate, or Mediate Men’s Gender Role Conflict?
  7. Do situational dynamics, micro-contexts or environmental cues moderate, mediate, or   cause GRC.

Answers below (click each title to view answers):

Research Question 1
  1. Do masculinity ideologies significantly relate to GRC (SPC, RE, RABBM, CBWFR)? What aspects of masculinity ideology correlates with GRC?

Table 1 Significant Correlations Between Masculinity Ideology Subscales and GRCS Subscales

Masculinity Ideology Measures & Subscales Total GRCS ScoreSPC2RERABBMCBWFR
MRNI Berger et al., 2005     
       Restrictive Emotionality.34**.33**.22**.34**.17**
       Self Reliance.46**.32**.17*.19*.11
       Rejection of Homosexuals.28**.29**.26**.46**.22*
       Avoidance of Femininity.37**.46**.32**.41**.19*
       Traditional Total Score.46**.50**.31**.38**.23*
CMNI (Mahalik et al., 2003     
       Winning.38***.52***.18**.23***.02
       Emotional Control.42***.10.66***.39**.01
       Risk Taking.14.23***.02.06.05
       Violence.17**.14.21**.11-.02
       Power over Women.37**.32**.30***.30***.07
       Dominance.44***.59***.21**.19**.16**
       Playboy.25**.18**.28***.19**.03
       Self Reliance.38***.22***.42***.29***.10
       Primacy of Work.30***.30***.19.12.21**
       Disdain for Homosexuals.36***.32***.21**.40***.04
       Pursuit of Status.16**.42***-.06-.04.05
       Total Conformity.56**.51**.48***.41***.09
BMS Walker et al., 2000     
       No Sissy Stuff .43**.39**.50**.05
       Big Wheel .56**.18*.40**.09
       Sturdy Oak .56**.30**.38**.20**
       Give em Hell .36**-.02.22**.11

Note. * p < .10. ** p < .05. *** p < .01.
1MRNI= Male Role Norm Inventory; CMNI= Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory; BSM= Brannon Masculinity Scale
2SPC= Success, Power Competition; RE= Restrictive Emotionality; RABBM= Restrictive and Affectionate Behavior Between Men; CBWFR= Conflict Between Work and Family Relations

References:
Berger, J.M., Levant, R.F., McMillan, K.K., Kelleher, W., Sellers, A. (2005). Impact of gender role conflict, traditional masculinity ideology, alexithymia, and age on men’s attitudes toward psychological help seeking. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 73-78.

Mahalik, J.R., Locke, B.D., Ludlow, L.H., Diemer, M.A., Scott, R.P., Gottfried, M., Freitas, G. (2003). Development of the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 3-25.

Walker, D.F., Tokar, D.M. & Fischer, A.R. (2000). What are the eight popular masculinity-related instruments measuring? Underlying dimensions and their relations to sociosexuality. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 1, 98-108.

Research Question 2

2. Do masculinity ideologies significantly relate to men’s psychological problems? What aspects of masculinity ideologies correlate with men’s problems?

After completing my review of gender role conflict research (O’Neil, 2008), I completed a review of the literature on what variables significantly correlate with masculinity ideology, masculine role norms, and conformity masculine norms significantly (O’Neil, 2010, 2011 a,  b). In my review, the research questions was: Does empirical evidence exist that masculinity ideology, gender role conflict and stress, hypermasculinity, and reference group identity dependence significantly correlate with men’s psychological and interpersonal problems?

To answer this question empirical studies that used the following 10 measures were comprehensively reviewed:  Masculine Role Norms Scale (MRNS; Thompson & Pleck, 1986), Male Role Norms Inventory (MRNI; Levant et al., 1992), Conformity to Masculine Norm Inventory (CMNI; Mahalik et al., 2003), Masculine Gender Role Stress Scale (MGRS; Eisler & Skidmore, 1987), Gender Role Conflict Scale (O’Neil, 2008), Gender Role Conflict Scale for Adolescents (Blazina, Pisecco, & O’Neil, 2005), Adolescent Masculinity Ideology Relationships Scale (Chu, Porche, & Tolman, 2005), Hypermasculinity Inventory (HMI, Mosher & Sirkin, 1984), Auburn Differentiated Masculinity Inventory (ADMI, Burk, Burkhart & Sikorski, 2004), and Reference Group Identity Dependence Scale (RGIDS, Wade & Gelso, 1998).

Table 2 summarizes the studies reviewed for the 10 published masculinity scales. For each study, every dependent variable that significantly correlated with a masculinity subscales is enumerated. Two hundred and forty-nine studies were reviewed. The summary of the masculinity ideology, norms, and conformity scales (MRNS, CMNI, & MRNI) indicated that attitudes about masculine norms have been statistically correlated with a wide variety of psychological and interpersonal problems in 26 studies. Over 58 dependent variables related to men’s problems have been significantly correlated with masculinity ideology, norms, and conformity. A similar pattern was evident with the GRCS and MGRSS studies. The 10 MGRSS studies correlated with 19 dependent variables and the 200 GRCS studies correlated with 87 separate indices of men’s personal and interpersonal problems. The four studies using hypermasculinity scales (HMI & ADMI) suggested that extremes in masculinity ideology were significantly correlated with 25 separate variables. Furthermore, three studies using the RGIDS found relationships between reference group status and eight male problems. Finally, three studies using the GRCS-A and ADMI indicated that masculinity problems and GRC related to 17 negative outcomes for adolescent boys.

The results in Table 2 represent the first summary of empirical research that correlates multiple measures of masculinity ideology, masculine gender role conflict/stress with men’s psychological and interpersonal problems. A careful study of Table 2 reveals some sobering relationships between specific masculinity constructs and dysfunctional living for men and boys. The results of the 249 studies in Table 2 provide a rather convincing case that the operationalized aspects of the masculinity construct that Addis et al. criticize, have significant relationships to men’s and boy’s psychological and interpersonal problems. These findings are important because until recently, empirical research has not confirmed that men’s psychological problems relate to masculinity constructs. The “hazards of being male” is no longer just a title of a once popular paperback but a documented scientific finding in the research.

Table 2

Thompson & Pleck’s Male Role Norm Scale (MRNS) Subscales: Status Norm, Toughness Norm, Anti-femininity Norm 
Reference Sources Psychological and Interpersonal Problems Significantly Correlated with MRNS 
Kilianski (2003)Negative Attitudes Lesbians; Hostile Sexism; Negative Attitudes Toward Women
Thompson & Pleck (1986)Opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment; Preference for Virgin Wife
Abreu, Goodyear, Campos, Newcomb (2000)Lack of Ethnic Belonging
Pleck, Sonenstein, & Ku, (1993)Suspension From School; Drinking & Use of Drugs; Being Picked Up By Police; Coercive Sex
Locke, Newcomb & Good year (2005)Increased Sexual Risk
Blazina, Eddins, Burridge, & Settle, (2007)Loneliness; Separation-Individuation Problems
Wilkinson (2004)Restricted Affectionate Behavior Between Men; Fear of Appearing Feminine; Antigay Attitudes
Jakupcak, Tull, & Roemer (2005)Overt Hostility & Aggression
Good, Heppner, Hillenband-Gunn, & Wang (1995)Adversarial Sexual Beliefs; Rape Myths; Psychological Violence
Mahalik’s Conformity To Male Role Scale (CMNI) Subscales: Winning, Emotional Control, Risk Taking, Violence, Power Over Women, Dominance, Playboy, Self-Reliance, Primacy of Work, Disdain for Homosexuals, Pursuit of Status, Total Conformity
Reference Sources Psychological and Interpersonal Problems Significantly Correlated with MRNS 
Mahalik, Locke, Ludlow, Diemer, Scott, Gottfried, & Freitas,(2003)Social dominance, aggression, muscularity
Mahalik & Lagan, & Morrison (2006)Unhealthy Alcohol Use; Neglecting Preventive Skin Care; Health Screenings; Not Seeking Help With Emotional Difficulties; Not Going to Health Care Appointments; Getting Into Physical Fights; Difficulty Managing Anger; Taking Risks; Risky Behavior With Automobiles & Sexual Practices
Liu & Iwamoto (2007)Substance Use; Marijuana Use; Binge Drinking
Mahalik & Rochlen (2006)Unhealthy Responses to Depression
Mahalik, Levi-Minzi, Walker, (2007)Health Risks; Few Health Promotion Behaviors
Smiler, (2006)Sexism
Mahalik, Burns, & Syzdek, (2007)Lack of Health Promotion Behaviors
Kimmel & Mahalik, (2005)Internalized Homophobia; Unhealthy Masculine Body Ideal; Distress
Burns & Mahalik (2006)Poor Sexual Functioning
Mahalik, Piere, & Wan (2006)Racial Identity: Pre-encounter Phase; Lower Self Esteem; Psychological Distress
Good, Schopp, Thomson, Hathway, Mazurek, Mintz, Sanford-Martens, (2006)Negative Attitudes About Help Seeking
Cohn & Zeichner (2006)Laboratory Shocks Given During Competition
Levant’s  Male Role Norms Inventory (MRNI) Subscales: Avoidance of Femininity; Fear and Hatred of Homosexuals; Self Reliance; Aggression; Achievement/Status; Non-Relational Attitudes Toward Sex; Restrictive Emotionality
Reference SourcesPsychological and Interpersonal Problems Significantly Correlated with MRNS 
Levant, Richmond, Majors, Inclan, Rossello, Heesacker, Rowan (2003)Alexithymia
Wade & Brittan-Powell (2001)Negative Attitudes About Racial Identity & Women’s Equality; Positive Attitudes Toward Condoning the Sexual Harassment of Women
Liu (2002)Racial Group Marginalization; Ethnocentrism
Berger, Levant, McMillan, Kelleher, & Sellers (2005)Negative Attitudes Toward Help Seeking

See full references here.

Research Question 3

3. Do the patterns of men’s GRC (SPC, RE, RABBM, CBWFR) correlate with men’s psychological and interpersonal problems? Which problems areas are correlated with GRC?

For each study cited below, GRC has been significantly correlated with one of the 23 dependent variables listed below.

Table 3. GRC and Dependent Variable References

DepressionAnxiety and StressHelp Seeking Attitudes
Blazina & Jackson, 2009
Blazina & Watkins, 1996 Brewer, 1998 Burke, 2000 Bursely, 1996 Choi, Kim, Hwang, & Heppner, 2010 Coonerty-Femiano, Kutzman, Femiano, Gemar, Toner, 2001 Cournoyer & Mahalik, 1995 Fragoso & Kashabeck, 2000 Friedman, 2011 Good & Mintz, 1990 Good, Robertson, Fitzgerald, Stevens, & Bartels, 1996 Good & Wood, 1995 Hayashi, 1999 Hoyt, 2009 Jo, 2000 Jones, 1998 Kang, 2001 Kelly, 2000 Kim, Choi, Ha, O’Neil, 2006 Larma, 2007 Mahalik & Cournoyer, 2000 Magovcevic & Addis, 2005 Mertens, 2000 Newman, 1997 Peterson, 1999 Sharpe & Heppner, 1991 Sharpe Heppner, & Dixon, 1995 Shepard, 2002 Simonsen, et al., 2000 Tate, 1998; Theodore &Lloyd, 1997 Thomas, 2008 Wolfram, Mohr, & Burchert, 2009
Blazina & Watkins, 1996
Burke, 2000 Bursely, 1996 Cournoyer & Mahalik, 1995
Davis, 1998 Hayashi, 1999 Kang, 2001 Jo, 2000 Jones, 1998 Mertens, 2000, 2001 Sharpe &
Heppner, 1991
Theodore & Lloyd, 2000 Fragoso & Kashubeck, 2000
Good et al, 1996
Hayes & Mahalik, 2000
Hetzel, 1998 Kratzner, 2003
Leka, 1998
Van Delft, 1998
Walker, 2008 Blashil & Hughes, 2009
Liang, Salcedo & Miller, 2011 Syzmanski & Carr, 2008 Wester, Vogel, Wei, Mclain, 2006 Wolfran et al, 2009 Hoyt, 2009 Sbratta, 2011 Wester, Christianson, Vogel, & Wei, 2007 Wester, Kuo, & Vogel, 2006 Blashill & Hughes, 2009 Stillson,1988 Hetzel, 1998
Bevan, 2010 Blazina & Marks, 2001 Blazina & Watkins, 1996
Bursley, 1996 Cortese, 2003
Davis & Liang, 2012 Englar-Carlson, 2001 Englar Carlson, 2001 Good & Wood, 1995 Good et al., 1989
Good et al., 2006 Goodwin, 2009 Groeschel, Wester, Sedivy, 2010 Jai, 2001 James, 2006 Mansfield, Addis, Courtenay, 2005
Jan-Marsi, 2011 Lane & Addis, 2005 Larma, 2007 Mendoza & Cummings, 2001 Osborne, 2004 Pederson & Vogel, 2007 Robertson & Fitzgerald, 1992
Rogers, 2009 Segalla, 1996 Shepard, 2009 Simonsen et al., 2000 Steinfeldt & Steinfeldt, 2010
Tsai, 2000 Vogel, Wester, Hammer, Downing-Matibag, 2013
White, 2002 Wisch et al., 1995 Mendoza & Cummings, 2001 Thompson, D. 2009
StigmaDiscriminationReligion and SpiritualityCoping and Problem Solving
Rogers, 2009 Vogel et al., 2013
Zumas, 2007 Steinfeldt, Steinfeldt, England, & Speight,  2009
Park & Seo, 2009
Wester, Arndt, Sedivy, & Arndt, 2010 Sheppard, 2009
Vogel, Wester, Hammer, Downing-Matibag, 2013 Magovceviv & Addis, 2005
Liang, Sakedo, Miller 2011 Robinson & Brewster, 2013
Byrce, 2012 Szymananski & Carr, 2008
Zhang, 2012 Szymanski & Ikize, 2012 Szymanski & Carr, 2008 Szymanski & Ikize, 2012 Sanchez, Westefeld, Lui, & Vilain, 2010
Baima, 2012 Heard, 2009 Jurkovic & Walker, 2006 Lammy, 2012 Laurent, 1997 Lily, 1999 Mahalik & Lagan, 2001 Reiman, 1999 Wilkinson, 2004Bergen, 1997 Birthistle, 1999
Jones, 1998 Stanzione, 2005
Strom, 2004 Szymanski & Carr, 2008
Wester, Kuo, & Vogel, 2006 Chamberlin, 1993
Good, Heppner, DeBord, Fischer, 2004 Varvel, 2008
Self EsteemPersonalityPsychoeducational InterventionsNegative Attitudes Toward Women and Others
Bingham, Harawa, Williams, 2012
Bursely, 1996 Choi, Kim, Hwang, & Heppner, 2010 Cournoyer, 1994
Davis, 1988 Hayashi, 1999 Hernandez, 2006
Hobza & Rochlen, 2009
Jo, 2000 Laurent, 1997 Lily, 1999 Mahalik et al., 2001 Schwartz et al., 1998 Sharpe & Heppner, 1991
Sharpe et al., 1995 Schwartz & Waldo, 2003 Shek & McEwen, 2012 Swenson, 1998
Vinson, 2011; Symananski & Carr, 2008
Cortese, 2003 Schwartz, Buboltz, Seeman, & Flye, 2004 Chamykarpour, Pourshahbaz, Dolatshahi, Moshtagh, 2012
Fischer, 2007 Kratzner, 2003
Serna, 2004 Sipes, 2005 Tokar et al., 2000
Arnold & Chartier, 1984
Chartier & Arnold, 1985 Chamberlin, 1993
Fischer, 2007 Kratzner, 2003
Serna, 2004 Sipes, 2005 Tokar et al., 2000
McAnulty, 1996 Davis & Liddell 2002 Kearney et al., 2004 Schwartz, Magee, Griffin, & Dupuis, 2004 Blazina & Marks, 2001 Robertson & Fitzgerald, 1992 Rochlen, McKelley, & Pituch, 2006 Schwartz & Waldo, 2003 Gertner, 1994 Maton, Anderson, Burke, Hoover, & Manowski 1998 Braverman, O’Neil, & Owen, 1992 Brooks-Harris, Heesacker, & Mejia-Millan, 1996 Nahon, 1992 Moore, 1993Kaplan, 1992 Kaplan O’Neil, & Owen, 1993 Serna, 2004 Schwartz & Waldo, 2005 Schwartz et al., 1998 Senn et al., 2000 Harnishfeger, 1998
Covell, 1998 Schwartz, et al., 2005 Rando, Rogers, & Brittan-Powell, 1998 Senn et al., 2000
Serna, 2004 Davis, 1997 Kassing et al., 2005 Rando, et al., 1998
Serna, 2004 Covell, 1998 Glomb & Espelage, 2005
Jacobs, 1996 Kearney, King & Rochlen, 2004
Chase, 2000 Cohn & Zeichner, 2006 Johnston, 2005
Hill & Fisher, 2001
Amato & MacDonald, 2011
Amato, 2012 O’Neil, Owen, Holmes, Dolgopolov, Slastenin, 1994  
Overall Interpersonal FunctioningClients and TherapistsIntimacy, Self-Disclosure, and Relationships With FathersMarital Satisfaction, Family Dynamics, and Couple’s GRC
Bruch, Berko, & Haase, 1998 Bruch, 2002 Davenport et al., 1998 Breiding, 2004 Breiding, Windle, & Smith, 2008 Celentana, 2000
Land, Rochlen, and Vaugh, 2011 Rochlen & Mahalik, 2004
Burke, 2000 Coonerty-Femiano et al., 2001 Cusack, Deane, Wilson, & Ciarrochi, 2006
Good et al., 1996
Hayes & Mahalik, 2000 Mertens, 2000
Noyes, 2004 Van Delft, 1998
Schaub & Williams, 2007
Wisch, Mahalik, Hayes, Nutt, 1995
Chartier & Arnold, 1985 Cournoyer & Mahalik, 1995 Fisher & Good, 1997 Good et al., 1995 Lindley & Schwartz, 2006 Odes, 2008 Sileo, 1996 Sharpe & Heppner, 1991 Rainwater, 2011 Sharpe et al., 1995 Theodore & Lloyd, 2000 Van Hyfte & Rabinowitz, 2001Alexander, 1999
Brewer, 1998 Campbell & Snow 1992 Leka, 1998 Scott, 2001 Sharpe et al., 1995 Breiding, 2004 Breiding, Windle & Smith, 2008 Celentana, 2000 Rochlen & Mahalik, 2004
Windel & Smith, 2009
Career DevelopmentAttachment, Bonding, and Family IndividuationBody Image and MuscularityAlcohol and Substance Abuse
Dodson & Borders, 2006
Jome & Tokar, 1997 Jome & Tokar, 1998 Rochlen, Blazina, & Rajhunathan, 2002 Rochlen & O’Brien, 2002 Wolfram, Mohr, and Borchert, 2009
Eimer & Kidd, 2010 Graef, Tokar, and Kaut, 2010 Faircloth, 2011 Rochlemn, Good, & Carver, 2009
Blazina, Novotny, Stevens, & Hunter, 2008 Blazina & Watkins, 2000
Cachia, 2001 Covell, 1998 DeFranc & Mahalik, 2002
Fischer, 2007 Fischer & Good, 1998 Griffin, 2011 James, 2006 Land, Rochlen, Vaugh, 2011 Napolitano, Mahalik, & Kenny, 1999 Schwartz et al., 2004 Selby, 1999 Siffert, 2012
Hobza and Rochlen 2009 Howells, 2010 McConville, 2004 McCreary, Saucier, & Courtenay, 2005
Mejias, 2010 Murray & Lewis, 2012 Schwartz, Grammas, Sutherland, Siffert, Bush-King, 2010
Shepard & Rickard, 2012 Schwartz & Tylka, 2008
Blazina & Watkins, 1996
Fahey, 2003 Good, Schoop, Thomson, Hathaway, Mazurek, Mintz, Sandford-Martens, 2006 Groeschel, Wester, & Sedivy, 2010 Howell, 2010 Kang, 2001 Korucuska & Thombs, 2003 McMahon et al., 2000 Monk & Riccuardelli, 2003 Peterson, 1999 Uy & Massoth, 2013
AlexithymiaShame and GuiltTrainingCollege Student Development
Berger, Levant, McMillan, Kelleher, & Sellers, 2005 Eicken, 2003 Fischer & Good, 1997 Hayashi, 1999 Shepard, 2002
Levant, Good, Cook, O’Neilo, Hasan, Smalley, 2010
D. Thomson, 2005 McMahon, Winkel, & Luthar, 2000 Segalla, 1996 Thompkins & Rando, 2003 Thomas, 2008 Thomson, 2005
Vu, 2000
Wester, Vogel, & Archer, 2004 Spillman, 2007
Sbratta, 2011 Holohan, 2008
Murphy 2001 Murtagh, 2012
Wester & Vogel, 2002
Davis & Lidell, 2002 Goodwin, 2009
Nelson, 2012 Sosoke, 2011 Syzdek, Beatty, Kellom, & Farr, 2005 Stanzione, 2005

See full references here.

Research Question 4

4. Does men’s GRC (SPC, RE, RABBM, & CBWFR) relate to gender role devaluations, restrictions, and violations of self and others in both the intrapersonal and interpersonal realms? For each study cited below, GRC has been significantly correlated with the 23 dependent variables listed below.

Table 4.

Self-Devaluations
Internalized heterosexism
Szymanski & Carr, 2008
Self-Objectification
Schwartz, Bush-King, 2011
Perceived Racism
Liang, Salcedo, Miller, 2010
Negative feeling about being gay
Sanchez, Westefeld, & Liu, 2010
Internalized Racism
Wester, Vogel, Wei, McLain, 2006
Homonegativity
Ervin, 2003
Sanchez, Westefeld, Li, & Vilain, 2010
Self-Esteem
Berko, 1994
Bursley, 1996
Cournoyer, 1994
Davis, 1998
Hayashi, 1999
Jo, 2000
Kim et al., 2001
Laurent, 1997
Mahalik et al., 2001
Schwartz et al., 1998
Sharpe & Heppner, 1991
Depression
Blazina & Watkins, 1996
Brewer, 1998
Burke, 2000
Bursely, 1996
Coonerty-Femiano, Jutzman, Femiano, Gemar, Toner, 2001
Cournoyer & Mahalik, 1995
Fragoso & Kashabeck, 2000
Good & Mintz, 1990
Good & Wood, 1995
Hayashi, 1999
Jo, 2000
Jones, 1998
Kang, 2001
(continued in next box)
Depression (continued)
Magovcevic & Addis, 2005
Mertens, 2001
Newman, 1997
Peterson, 1999
Good, Robertson, Fitzgerald, Stevens, & Bartels, 1996
Sharpe & Heppner, 1991
Sharpe, Heppner, & Dixon, 1995
Shepard, 2002
Simonsen, et al., 2000
Tate, 1998
Theodore, 1997
Negative Attitudes Toward “Outness”
Sanchez, 2002
Sanchez et al., 2009
Kelly, 2000
Kim, Choi, Ha, O’Neil, 2006
Mahalik & Cournoyer, 2000
Shame & Shame Proneness
McMahon, Winkel, & Luthar, 2000
Segalla, 1996
Thompkins & Rando, 2003
Thomson, 2005
 
Self-Restrictions
Emotional Irritation
Wolfram, Mohr, & Borchert, 2009
Emotional Dysregulation
Cohn, Jakupcak, Seibert, Hildebrandt, 2010
Stigma toward career counseling
Graef, Tokar, & Kaut, 2010
Hopelessness
Birthistle, 1999
Brewer, 1998
Physical and Psychological Strain
Stillson, 1988
Social and Self Stigma
Park & Seo, 2009
Stigma associated with counseling
Wester, Arndt, Sedivy, Arndt, 2010
Difficulty Identifying Feelings
Wong, Pituch & Rochlen, 2006
Global levels of Psychological Stress
Hetzel et al., 1998
Greater emotional inexpressiveness
Davenport et al., 1998
Loneliness
Blazina, Settle, & Eddins, 2008
Self-Self disclosure
Swenson, 1998
Horhoruw, 1991
Shyness
Berko, 1994
Bruch, 2002
Bruch et al., 1998
Lack of intimacy and male friendship
Sileo, 1996
Dyadic adjustment
Breiding, 2005
Brewer, 1998
Campbell & Snow, 1992
Stigma for seeking psychological help
Steinfeldt, Steinfeldt, England, Speight; 2009
Negative Attitudes Toward Problem Solving
Chamberlin, 1993
Parenting dissatisfaction and a lack of parenting self-efficacy
Alexander, 1999
Coping
Bergen 1997
Birthistle, 1999
Jones, 1998
Stanzione 2005
Strom, 2004
Wester, Kuo et al., 2006
Marital satisfaction
Alexander, 1995
Brewer, 1998
Campbell & Snow, 1992
Sharpe et al., 1995
Greater career counseling stigma, decreased willingness to engage in career counseling
Rochlen et al., 2002
Rochlen & O’Brien, 2002
Personality styles: of neuroticism, introversion, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, aggressiveness, narcissism, Cortese, 2003
Kratzner, 2003
Schwartz et al., 2004
Immature and neurotic defenses (projection, denial, and isolation) and defenses that are turned against others
Mahalik, Cournoyer, DeFranc, Cherry, & Napolitano, 1998
Alexithymia
Berger, Levant, McMillan, Kelleher, & Sellers, 2005
Eicken & Boswell, 2002
Fischer & Good, 1997
Hayashi, 1999
Shepard, 2002
Intimacy
Chartier & Arnold, 1985
Cournoyer & Mahalik, 1995
Fisher & Good, 1997
Good et al., 1995
Lindley & Schwartz, 2006
Sharpe & Heppner, 1991
Sharpe et al., 1995
Theodore & Lloyd, 2001
Van Hyfte & Rabinowitz, 2001
Stress
Fragoso & Kashubeck, 2000
Good et al., 2004
Good et al., 1996
Hayes & Mahalik, 2000
Hetzel, 1998
Hetzel, Davenport, & Brooks, 1998
Kratzner, 2003
Leka, 1998
Van Delft, 1998
Marital adjustment, lower daily marital happiness, greater depressive symptomatology, and greater negative affect for women
Breiding, 2003, 2004
Breiding & Smith, 2002
Celentana, 2000
Anxiety
Blazina & Watkins, 1996
Burke, 2000
Bursely, 1996
Cournoyer & Mahalik, 1995
Davis, 1988
Hayashi, 1999
Kang, 2001
Jo, 2000
Jones, 1998
Mertens, 2000, 2001
Sharpe & Heppner, 1991
Theodore & Lloyd, 2000
Psychological distress including problems with hostility, compulsiveness, social discomfort, paranoia, psychoticism, obsessive-complusivity, and interpersonal sensitivity
Good et al., 1996
Hayes & Mahalik, 2000
Attachment Problems To Parents
Blazina & Watkins, 2000
Cachia, 2001
Covell, 1998
DeFranc & Mahalik, 2002
Fischer, in press
Fischer & Good, 1998
James, 2006
Napolitano, Mahalik, & Kenny, 1999
Schwartz, 2001
Schwartz et al., 2004
Selby, 1999
Personality: Styles, Types, Models, Ego Identity, & Authoritarianism
Cortese, 2003
Schwartz, Buboltz, Seeman, & Flye, 2004
Fischer, in press
Kratzner, 2003
Serna, 2004
Sipes, 2005
Tokar et al., 2000
Arnold & Chartier, 1984
Chartier & Arnold, 1985
Rounds, 1994
Chamberlin, 1993
Help seeking attitudes and preference for help
Blazina & Marks, 2001
Blazina & Watkins, 1996
Bursley, 1996
Cortese, 2003
Englar-Carlson, 2001
Englar Carlson & Vandiver, 2001
Good & Wood, 1995
Good et al., 1989
Good et al., 2006
James, 2006
Lane & Addis, 2005
Osborne, 2004
Robertson & Fitzgerald, 1992
Segalla, 1996
Simonsen et al., 2000
Tsai, 2000
White, 2002
Wisch et al., 1995
 
Self-Violations
Low and high health risk
Courtenay & McCreary, 2010
Chronic self-destructiveness
Naranjo, 2001
High risk behaviors
Courtenay & McCreary 2001
Negative alcohol-related consequences
Groweschel, Wester, Sedivy, 2010
Eating disorder symptomatology
Blashill & Vander Wal, 2009
Suicide attempts, acceptability, and risk
Houle, Mishara, Chagnon, 2007
Self Objectification
Schwartz, Grammas, Sutherland, Siffert, & Bush-King, 2011
Substance/alcohol abuse
Blazina & Watkins, 1996
Fahey, 2003
Kang, 2001
Korucuska & Thombs, 2003
McMahon et al., 2000
Monk & Riccuardelli, 2003
Peterson, 1999
Suicidal probability, amount of GRC for suicidal vs. non-suicidal
Borthwick, 1997
Borthick et al., 1997
Houle, 2004
Devaluations By Others
No data to report
Restrictions By Others
No data to report
Violations By Others
No data to report
Devaluation of Others
Husbands’ GRC reported spousal criticism
Breiding, 2003
Sex role stereotyping
Rando, Rogers, & Brittan-Powell, 1998
Negative attitudes toward African Americans
Robinson & Schwartz, 2004
Homophobic and antigay attitudes
Kassing et al., 2005
Lindley & Schwartz, 2006
Rounds, 1994
Schwartz, Tylka, & Hood, 2005
Van Hyfte, 1999
Walker et al., 2000
Wilkinson, 2004
Low sex role egalitarianism
Addelston, 1995
Englar-Carlson & Vandiver, 2001
Tokar, Fischer, & Staub, 1998
Restriction of Others
No data to report
Violations of Others
Hostile sexism
Covell, 1998
Schwartz, et al., 2005
Abusive behaviors and coercion
Schwartz et al., 1998
Senn et al., 2000
Dating violence
Harnishfeger, 1998
Sexually aggressive behaviors and likelihood of forcing sex
Kaplan, 1992
Kaplan O’Neil, & Owen, 1993
Serna, 2004
Hostility towards women
Rando, Rogers, & Brittan-Powell, 1998
Senn et al., 2000
Serna, 2004
Rape myth acceptance
Davis, 1997
Kassing et al., 2005
Rando, et al., 1998
Serna, 2004
Positive attitudes toward and tolerance for sexual harassment
Covell, 1998
Glomb & Espelage, 2005
Jacobs, 1996
Kearney, King & Rochlen, 2004
Self Reported Violence & Aggression
Amato, 2005
Chase, 2000
Cohn & Zeichner, 2006
Johnston, 2005
Actual Destructive or Violent Behavior Toward Others
Amato, 2005
Breiding, 2003, 2004,
Breiding & Smith, 2002;
Johnston, 2005,
Kaplan et al., 1993

See full references here.

Research Question 5

5. Is there evidence that gender role devaluations, restrictions, and violations relate to minority men’s psychological problems?

Table 5. Diversity Research on Gender Role Conflict Self Devaluations, Restrictions and Violations

Gender Role Conflict Self-DevaluationsAuthorsGroup
Internalized heterosexismSzymanski & Carr, 2008Gay men
HomonegativityErvin, 2003Gay men
Negative attitude toward “Being Out”Sanchez, 2005Gay men
Negative feeling about being gaySanchez, Westefeld, Liu, & Vilain, 2010Gay men
Self-hate from racismWester, Vogel, Wei, & McLain, 2006African American Men
DepressionBrewer
Coonerty-Femiano, Kutzman, Femiano, Gemar, & Toner, 2001
Fragoso & Kashubeck, 2000
Hayashi, 1999
Jo, 2000; Kang, 2001; Kim, Choi, Heppner, 2012
Jones, 1995; Simonsen, Blazina, & Watkins, 2000
Tate, 1998; Theodore, 2007 (?)
African American Men
Sexual Abuse Victims
Mexican American Men
Japanese Men
Korean Men
Gay men
Australian Men
Self-esteemHayashi, 1999
Jo, 2000; Kim, Hwang, & Choi, 2005
Laurent, 1997
Mahalik, Locke, Theordore, Cournoyer, & Lloyd, 2001
Japanese Men
Korean Men
African American Men
Australian Men
ShameMcMahon, Winkel, & Luthar 2009African American
Gender Role Conflict Self RestrictionsAuthorGroup
CopingBirthistle, 1999
Jones, 1998
Wester, Kuo, & Vogel, 2006
Irish Men
Gay Men
Chinese Canadian Adolescents
AnxietyHayashi, 1999
Kang, 2001
Jo, 2000
Jones, 1998
Theodore & Lloyd, 2000
Japanese Men
Korean college students
Korean Men
Gay Men
Australian Men
StressFragoso & Kashubeck, 2000; Lekd (?)Mexican American Men
AlexithymiaHayashi, 1999Japanese Men
HopelessnessBirthistle, 1999
Brewer, 1998
Irish Men
African American Men
IntimacyChartier & Arnold, 1985
Theodore & Lloyd, 2000
Van Hyfte & Rabinowitz, 2001
Canadian Men
Australian Men
Gay Men
Help Seeking AttitudesJames (2006)Canadian Men
Gender Role Conflict Self Violations Authors                                         Group               
Eating Disorder SymptomologyGlashill & Vanderwal, 2009Gay Men
Substance Use & AbuseKang, 2001
Monk & Ricciardelli, 2003
Korean college students
Australian Men
Chronic Self-DestructivenessNaranjo, 2001Gay Men
Suicidal Attempts or RiskHoule, Mishara, & Chagnon, 2009Canadian Men

See full references here.

Research Question 6

6. Do Diversity and Multicultural Indices Relate To , Moderate, or Mediate Men’s Gender Role Conflict?

Table 6a shows the variables that correlate, moderate, or mediate GRC for minority men.

Table 6a.

Contextual, Demographic, Multicultural Variables Correlated with GRC For Minority Men: Race, class, ethnicity, age, stage of life, sex (women and transgendered people), socioeconomic status (SES), educational level,  marital status, work roles, nationality, acculturation and assimilation,  racial & ethnic identity, machismo ideology & cabalerismo, cultural values, personal & societal discrimination, states of vulnerability, being violent.
Moderators of GRC for Minority Men: Less ambivalence & confusion about racial identity, Asian identity, self-esteem, assimilation into the majority culture, traditional African American religious acculturation, Black identity salience, multicultural inclusive racial identity, attitudes toward help seeking,  pre-encounter state of racial identity, depression, stress, acculturation, machismo, acculturation, monocultural  versus bicultural status, distress, caballerismo, perceived racism, sex typing of self, homonegativity, environmental mastery, purpose in life, internalized heteoresexism
Mediators of GRC for Minority Men: Racial identity, psychological stress (?) , internalized racism, norms of the dominant white culture, machismo ideology, homonegativity, shame, guilt, heterosexist discrimination, internalized heterosexism, self-esteem, negative affect, social sensitivity, internalized heterosexism,  avoidant coping,  and multicultural inclusiveness

Table 6b shows the variables that significantly moderate or mediate GRC for men in general.

Table 6b.   Moderators Studies and Gender-Role Conflict (GRC)

AuthorGRC as PredictorsModerator Variable
Robison & Brewster (2013)GRCInternalized Heterosexism & GRC
  Shek & McEwen (2012)  Less RE  Less ambivalence & confusion about racial identity and Asian identity
  Pierce (2012)  GRC  Level of support
  Amato (2012)  GRC  Prisoner’s age, violence, religion, family history of crime
  Murray & Lewis (2012)  GRC  Age, muscle, height, and body dissatisfaction
  Courtenay & McCreary (2011)  RABBM  Multiple high risk behavior
  Amato & MacDonald  GRC  Age, drug use, violence, with homeless men
  Galligan, Barnett, Brennan, & Israel (2010)  GRC  Resilience
  Liang, Salcedo, & Miller (2010)  GRC  Machismo, cabalerismo, perceived stress and racism
  Graef, Tokar, & Kaut  GRC  Attitudes toward career counseling stigma, willingness to seek career counseling
  Hoyt (2009)  GRC  Emotional expression, emotional processing, age
  Windle & Smith (2009)  RE & RABBM  Husband’s withdrawal
  Blashill & Hughes (2009)  GRC  Sextyping of self, distress
  Wolfram, Mohr, Borchet (2008)  GRC  Worker dissatisfaction, higher irritation, higher depression & anxiety, expressiveness, instrumentality
  Wester, Christiansan, Vogel, & Wei (2007)  RABBM  ?
  Thomas (2005)  GRC  Psychological Reactance
  McCreary, Saucier, & Courtenay (2005)  SPC & CBWFR  Drive for muscularity
  Schwartz, Waldo, Daniel (2005)  RE  Self-esteem, intimidation, & threats
  Robison & Schwartz (2004)  White men’s RABBM & SPC  Negative attitudes toward African Americans
  Ervin (2003)  GRC  Homonegativity, environmental mastery, purpose in life
  Monk & Ricciardelli (2003)  RE  Alcohol & cannabis use
  Bruch (2003)  RABBM & RE  Shyness, toughness
  Cachia (2001)  GRC  Attachment avoidance
  Fragosa & Kashubeck (2000)  GRC(?)  Depression, stress, machismo
  Alexander (1999)  RE  Satisfaction and feelings of efficacy as parents
  Newman (1998)  GRC  Self-silencing and depression
  Lilly (1999)  GRC  Traditional African American religious acculturation, Black male identity, salience
  Friedman (2011)  GRC  SES unemployed men (N.S.)
  Jana-Masri (2011)  GRC  Religiosity to Islam (N.S.)

TABLE 6c.   Mediator Studies

Authors – StudiesPredictorsMediatorsOutcome Variables
Vogel, Wester, Hammer, & owning-Matibag (2013)RE & RABBMStigmaWillingness to refer a friend or family member
Shepard & Rickards (2012)Drive for Muscularity, GRCGRC Self-stigma of seeking help, attitudes toward seeking helpIntentions to seek help
Szymanski & Ikizler (2012)RABBM & heterosexist discriminationInternalized HeterosexismDepression
Uy (2011)Muscularity IdeologyDrinking to copeAlcohol consumption Drinking problems
Griffin (2011)Attachment InsecurityGRCSexual compulsivity
Groeschel, Wester, & Sedivy, (2010)Negative alcohol Related consequencesGRCAttitude toward help seeking
Choi, Kim, Hwang, & Heppner (2010)SPC, RE, RABBMLow self-esteemDepression & instrumentality
Wester, Arndt, Sedivy, & Arndt (2010)Greater risk, fewer benefitsGRCStigma associated with counseling
Hoyt (2009)GRCEmotional depressionDistress explanation
Park & Seo (2009)GRCSelf & Social StigmaLess positive & willingness to seek counseling
Blashill & Vanderwal (2009)GRCNegative affect, social sensitivityEating disorder symptomology
Houle, Mischard, & Chagnon (2009)GRCRisk factors of help seeking & social supportSuicidal behavior
Szymanski & Carr  (2008)GRCSelf-esteem and avoidant copingPsychological distress
Breiding, Windle, & Smith (2008)GRCHusband’s criticism, wives’ criticism & self criticismMarital adjustment
Varvel (2008)Attitudes toward problem solvingGRCPsychological functioning
Wester, Christianson, Vogel, & Wei (2007)RESocial supportPsychological support
Wester, Kuo, Vogel (2006)SPC, RE, RABBMAvoidant & engagements copingPsychological stress
Batty (2006)GRCTask copingTherapy preference
Wester, Vogel, Wei, & McLain (2006)GRCRacial identity as internalized racism (self-hatred)Psychological distress
Sipes (2005)Perceived gender role socializationMasculinity IdeologyGRC
Carter, Williams, & Juby (2005)GRCRacial IdentitySeverity of problem
Serna (2004)GRCPersonalitySexual aggression against women
Breiding (2004)GRCHusband’s observed hostilityWives’ marital adjustment
White (2002)RE & RABBMMulticultural InclusivenessAttitudes toward help seeking
Hill & Fischer (2001)Masculine Gender Role Components & GRCEntitlements & General EntitlementRape related variables
Swenson (1998)REAgeSelf-disclosure
Tokar & Jome (1998)GRCCareer choice traditionalityVocational interests
Covell (1998)GRCSexist attitudes, ageLikelihood to sexually harassment
Bruch, Berko, Haas (1995)Personality AttributesREInterpersonal competence
Davis (1987)GRCSex Role Salience?
Baima (2012)GRCSpiritual well-beingPsychological Distress (N.S.)
Tsan, Day, Schwartz, & Kimbrel (2011)Behavioral inhibition, Behavioral activation(?)N.S.
Steinfeldt, Rutowski, Vaugh, & Steinfeldt (2011)GRCMoral atmosphere and moral functioning? N.S.
Land, Rochlen, Vaugh (2011)Maternal bondingGRC, negative mood regulationAdult attachment avoidance N.S.
Faircloth (2011)GRCDemographics (age, time in the job, education, area of work)Job satisfaction to explain sex deference N.S.
Hobza & Rochlen (2009)GRCSelf-esteemDrive for muscularity N.S.
Daltry (2009)GRCWomen’s distress toleranceQuality of athletic life N.S.
Olsen (2000)GRCTrait angerAnger expression

See full references here.

Research Question 7

7. Do situational dynamics, micro-contexts or environmental cues moderate, mediate, or cause GRC?

          See Situational GRC Research Models by clicking here.

O’Neil and Denke Refererences (2016)

This file provides references to a summary of GRC research found in:

O’Neil, J.M. & Denke, R. (2016). An Empirical review of the gender role conflict research: New conceptual models and research paradigms. In J. Wong and S. Wester (Eds.) APA Handbook of the Psychology of Men and Masculinities. (pp 51-80), Washington, D.C.: APA Books.

These files also have many of the references to the research questions discussed in this part of the web page.

References from O’Neil & Denke (2016)

References for Masculine Ideology

Moderators and Correlates

Table 3 Citations and References

Self Devaluations and Self Restrictions

Diversity Research on Gender Role Conflict Self Devaluations, Restrictions and Violations